Currently released so far... 5267 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AORC
AJ
AM
AMGT
AE
AU
AGMT
AG
AS
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
CU
CO
CH
CDG
CIA
CACM
CDB
CI
CS
CVIS
CA
CBW
CASC
CD
CV
CMGT
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CG
CF
CN
CAN
COUNTER
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
EG
ECON
ETTC
EFIN
EZ
ETRD
EUN
ELAB
EU
EINV
EAID
EMIN
ENRG
ECPS
EN
ER
ET
ES
EPET
EUC
EI
EAIR
EAGR
EIND
EWWT
ELTN
EREL
ECIN
EFIS
EINT
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELN
EFTA
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ENVI
ESENV
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
IV
IR
IS
IZ
IAEA
IN
IT
ICTY
IQ
ICAO
INTERPOL
IPR
INRB
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IWC
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KGIC
KDEM
KTIP
KOMC
KNNP
KWBG
KU
KPAL
KGHG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KHLS
KSUM
KSPR
KJUS
KCRM
KGCC
KPIN
KDRG
KTFN
KG
KBIO
KHIV
KSCA
KN
KS
KCOR
KZ
KE
KFRD
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KIRF
KIRC
KACT
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCFC
KTIA
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
MOPS
MARR
MNUC
MX
MASS
MCAP
MO
MIL
MTCRE
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
OVIP
OPDC
OPRC
OIIP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OAS
OEXC
ODIP
OREP
OFDP
OTRA
OSCE
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
PARM
PREL
PTER
PHUM
PGOV
PINR
PINS
PREF
PK
PE
PBTS
POGOV
PROP
PINL
PL
POL
PBIO
PSOE
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
SOCI
SY
SENV
SA
SP
SNAR
SG
SCUL
SR
STEINBERG
SF
SW
SU
SL
SMIG
SO
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
TS
TU
TX
TBIO
TW
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UN
US
UNGA
UNSC
UNO
UNMIK
UV
UY
UP
UG
USEU
USUN
UZ
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE745, SUPREME COURT RULING DELAYS CAFTA IMPLEMENTATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE745.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE745 | 2008-09-12 23:11 | 2011-03-02 16:04 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0745/01 2562349
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 122349Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0103
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO PRIORITY 1594
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000745
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC AND EEB; PLEASE PASS TO
USTR:AMALITO AND DOLIVER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CS ECON ETRD PGOV PINR PREL
SUBJECT: SUPREME COURT RULING DELAYS CAFTA IMPLEMENTATION
PAST OCTOBER 1
REF: SAN JOSE 634 AND PREVIOUS
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The Costa Rican Supreme Court has thrown
up one more obstacle to CAFTA, ruling that one section of the
final CAFTA implementation bill (on IPR and biodiversity
issues) was unconstitutional. The Constitutional Chamber
(Sala IV) held that the GOCR should have consulted with Costa
Rica,s indigenous communities, in compliance with the ILO
Convention 169, about CAFTA-generated changes in the existing
biodiversity law that could affect those communities. The
Sala IV,s action shocked the GOCR, pro-CAFTA legislators and
the private sector. While a definitive prognosis awaits
publication of the full Sala ruling (expected on September
16), VP Chinchilla told is September 12 that meeting the
October 1 EIF deadline was now completely out of the
question, even under the best case scenario. She said the
GOCR will need another 1-3 months to correct and re-approve
the IPR bill. Chinchilla and COMEX VM Pacheco did not ask us
explicitly for an EIF extension (nor did we even hint at
one), but they made clear that the GOCR was already laying
the groundwork, and had received positive signals thus far
from other CAFTA members. They also stressed that the Arias
administration, its pro-CAFTA allies in the legislature and
the private sector had been re-galvanized into action by the
Sala ruling, and were determined to wrap up this law and all
the pending technical issues as quickly as possible. COMEX
Minister Ruiz is to call DUSTR Vereneau on September 15 to
discuss the issue. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------
Sala Surprise Attack
-------------------------
¶2. (U) On September 11, the Sala IV (Constitutional Court)
ruled 4-3 that one section of the final CAFTA implementation
bill (on IPR and biodiversity issues) was unconstitutional.
The majority opinion, written by Supreme Court President Luis
Paulino Mora, held that the GOCR should have consulted with
Costa Rica,s indigenous communities, in compliance with the
ILO Convention 169, about CAFTA-generated changes in the
existing biodiversity law that could affect those
communities. The Sala also ruled that proposed changes in
the law had not been publicized adequately. Details on the
Sala,s decision are pending release of the full ruling,
expected on September 16.
¶3. (U) NOTE: The relevant portion of Article 6 of the 1989
ILO convention, which is also known as the Indigenous and
Tribal Peoples Convention, states that "governments shall
consult the peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures
and in particular through their representative institutions,
whenever consideration is given to legislative or
administrative measures which may affect them directly."
This issue had not been raised in the Sala IV,s majority
opinions on other CAFTA legislation. END NOTE.
¶4. (SBU) The Sala IV,s action shocked the GOCR, pro-CAFTA
legislators and the private sector, and generated a series of
emergency meetings convened by VP Laura Chinchilla (acting
for President Arias who was still in Europe). In an evening
press conference, a stunned-looking Chinchilla indicated that
the GOCR respected the Court,s decision, but now doubted
that Costa Rica could implement CAFTA in time for the October
1 entry-into-force deadline. She added that she would
"explore the possibility" of extending the deadline in a
meeting with the Embassy on September 12. The press
conference was followed by media releases on September 11 and
12 noting that the Sala,s decision placed full
implementation by October 1 in jeopardy, but underscoring the
GOCR,s determination to do all it could do to complete CAFTA
as quickly as possible.
-------------------------------------------
GOCR Will Not Make the Deadline
------------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) Meeting with the DCM and Emboffs on September 12,
Chinchilla and COMEX Vice Minister Amparo Pacheco reiterated
that they had no advance notice of the somewhat puzzling Sala
IV decision. The good news: the Court had found only
procedural problems, which were less difficult to correct.
Court President Mora himself had assured Chinchilla that the
correction process should be "manageable". The bad news:
meeting the October 1 EIF deadline was now completely out of
the question, even under the best case scenario. Chinchilla
(who had been in contact with President Arias, COMEX Minister
Ruiz and the other senior officials traveling in Europe)
predicted it would take "another 1-3 months" to address the
problems identified by the Court.
¶6. (SBU) According to Chinchilla, in the best case scenario,
the Sala would provide its full ruling to the legislature
ASAP; she had asked the Court to do so by September 16. The
Constitutional Consultation Committee would then take action,
hopefully agreeing to strip out the problematic text and
sending the modified bill for approval by a plenary vote.
Given debate rules and the possibility of majority and
minority reports issued by the committee, even this "fast"
scenario could take a few weeks, and Chinchilla stressed that
any changes to the law would have to be accepted by USTR as
well. She added that the highly legalistic pro-CAFTA
Libertarian Movement (ML) party could be as problematic in
thi scenario as the PAC-led opposition.
¶7. (SBU) n a worst case scenario, the law might have to be
more extensively modified, which would take more tme, and/or
the opposition might press for anothe 30-day Sala IV review.
If indigenous consultatons could not be handled in parallel
(and separaely from the CAFTA bill itself), then additionaltime would be required before the bill was complete. If
comprehensive community-by-community consutations were
required, the GOCR could find itsel holding the equivalent
of a "mini-referendum" o CAFTA with the indigenous people.
The GOCR wantd to avoid this at all costs: such a lengthy
dela could invite new attacks from the small, but stil
vocal, anti-CAFTA minority. Chinchilla and Paceco seemed
reasonably confident, however, that tis "worse-worst" case
option would not be needed, pending analysis of the Sala
IV,s full ruling.
--------------------------------------------- --------
Laying Groundwork for a Second Extension
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶8. (SBU) Chinchilla and Pacheco did not ask us explicitly
for an EIF extension (nor did we even hint at one), but they
made clear that the GOCR was already laying the groundwork.
Minister Ruiz and the Costa Rican Embassy in Washington had
begun informal consultations with the other CAFTA members.
The signals about a later entry for Costa Rica were positive
thus far, according to Pacheco. Echoing the earlier media
releases, Chinchilla and Pacheco made clear that the Arias
administration, its pro-CAFTA allies in the legislature and
the private sector had been re-galvanized into action by the
Sala ruling, and were determined to make the required
corrections to this last law, plus resolve the pending
technical issues on IPR, insurance and telecom, as quickly as
possible. Chinchilla acknowledged that "everything" had to
be completed before CAFTA could enter into force for Costa
Rica. She added that Minister Ruiz would call DUSTR
Vereneau on September 15 to discuss these issues further.
---------------
COMMENT
---------------
¶9. (SBU) This ruling was clearly a surprising blow to the
GOCR, which as recently as September 10 had been laying out a
(very optimistic) timetable to complete all legislation and
regulations by September 23. But, there are some silver
linings. The pro-CAFTA forces are energized and believe they
can bring this to resolution. The GOCR is doing its own
heavy lifting to prepare the other CAFTA partners to permit
later EIF by Costa Rica. Under these circumstances, although
they are not ideal, we recommend that President Arias be
included in the September 24 AGP summit as planned. Being
in a room full of counterparts who have long since completed
their FTAs with the United States, and hearing a strong
pro-trade message from POTUS can only help.
¶10. (SBU) Later, we (and the Arias administration, no doubt)
will examine more closely why the Sala made this decision,
and why President Mora (who acknowledged to the Ambassador
recently the need to get CAFTA done) authored it.
Interestingly, Sala IV President Ana Virginia Calzada, a
biodiversity expert who had ruled (in the minority) against
some of the earlier CAFTA bills, and who was judged most
likely of all the magistrates to have voted no on this bill,
ruled in favor this time. Finally, for those keeping score,
the legislature approved one additional bill since our last
report (Reftel), bringing the total approved to 12, with nine
of those actually signed into law.
CIANCHETTE